Skip to content

Ethical brand ratings and accreditation since 2001

Back to table

Clean & Clear

Is Clean & Clear a good brand for the Environment, for Animals and for People?

Clean & Clear is a skincare brand, originally developed by Revlon in the late 1950s and sold to Johnson & Johnson in 1991. Johnson & Johnson re-marketed and rebranded Clean & Clear to focus on acne in young people. Since then, Clean & Clear has remained popular anti-acne line with young British and American customers.

Unfortunately, due to the unethical activity of Clean & Clear’s parent corporation, Johnson & Johnson, this skincare brand has received a low Good Shopping Guide score, and appears very low on our Ethical Skincare Ratings Table!

We encourage all skincare brands to keep pushing for ethical excellence, always considering the Environment, Animals and People when making business decisions and creating, sourcing and selling beauty products. Beauty is a luxury, and therefore, there is no reason why beauty brands cannot strive for better standards of sustainability and ethics.

Where does Clean & Clear score well?

Despite its low score, Clean & Clear does score well in a minority of categories. For instance, Clean & Clear receives a top rating in the Fossil Fuels, Nuclear Power and Armaments categories, as neither Clear & Clear or Johnson & Johnson are involved in these controversial industries.

Where does Clean & Clear score poorly?

Unfortunately, due to Johnson & Johnson’s poor ethics, Clean & Clear receives a low rating in most criteria. Firstly, as the brand is neither organic or plant-based, it has a bottom rating in both the Organic and Vegetarian/Vegan categories.

Johnson & Johnson also publicly admits that it allows animal testing on its products when required by law (such as when they are sold in the Chinese market), so Clean & Clear receives a bottom rating for Animal Welfare.

Moreover, Clean & Clear receives the lowest rating for Public Record Criticisms+, a category that is only given to brands which have received several serious criticisms for unethical activities. This is due to the fact that Johnson & Johnson is regularly criticised for its poor practices, such as allegations of greenwashing, workers’ exploitation and abuse, plastic pollution and more.

 

Ethical performance in category

0

GSG score

28
75

GSG category benchmark

100

Ethical Rating

Environment

  • Environmental Report

    Acceptable

  • Genetic Modification

    Good

  • Organic

    Poor

  • Nuclear Power

    Good

  • Fossil Fuels

    Good

Animal

  • Animal Welfare

    Poor

  • Vegetarian/Vegan Verified

    Poor

People

  • Armaments

    Good

  • Irresponsible Marketing

    Poor

  • Political Donations

    Poor

Other

  • Ethical Accreditation

    Poor

  • Public Record Criticisms

    Poor

  • Public Record Criticisms+

    Poor

= GSG Top Rating = GSG Middle Rating = GSG Bottom Rating