Skip to content

Ethical brand ratings and accreditation since 2001

Back to table
Good shopping guide ethical accreditation tick

Fat Face

Is FatFace sustainable and ethical?

FatFace is an above-benchmark brand in The Good Shopping Guide’s Ethical Ratings.

FatFace is a fashion retailer owned by the FatFace Group Ltd., and receives an impressive Good Shopping Guide score in our Ethical Fashion Retailers Ratings Table. We hope other companies will follow FatFace’s example and make further progress in the future.

In what areas does FatFace perform well? 

FatFace performs well in our criteria for its Environmental Report. The fashion brand publishes its Sustainable Product information on its website; goals to achieve by 2025 include: all of the polyesters will be made from recycled materials, all viscose goods will come from environmentally friendly sources, the Leather Working Group (LWG) tanneries will supply all leather. In FatFace’s Impact Report, the company also provides some evidence of goals met so far, such as lowering its carbon emissions.

For those consumers passionate about Animal Welfare, FatFace also scores well for its policy on animal rights and animal cruelty. FatFace does not use feathers, down, animal fur, mohair, or angora and to be sure that there’s no animal testing on its cosmetics, this fashion retailer uses the Leaping Bunny Standard.

The FatFace Foundation has also given more than £1 million to charities since 2009. Additionally, FatFace has promised to donate the equivalent of 1% of its annual income to a sustainable fundraising stream. Publishing these details allows consumers and consumer groups to hold brands to account.

To find out more about FatFace, see its website.

Ethical performance in category

0

GSG score

77
68

GSG category benchmark

100

Ethical Rating

Environment

  • Environmental Report

    Good

  • Organic

    Good

  • Nuclear Power

    Good

  • Better Cotton Initiative

    Good

  • Fossil Fuels

    Good

Animal

  • Animal Welfare

    Good

People

  • Armaments

    Good

  • Code of Conduct

    Acceptable

  • Political Donations

    Good

  • Ethical Trading Schemes

    Good

  • Human Rights

    Acceptable

Other

  • Ethical Accreditation

    Poor

  • Other Criticisms

    Acceptable

= GSG Top Rating = GSG Middle Rating = GSG Bottom Rating