Skip to content

Ethical brand ratings and accreditation since 2001

Back to table

No.7

Is No.7 an ethical brand?

No.7 is a skincare brand owned by conglomerate Walgreens Boots Alliance. It receives a poor Good Shopping Guide score on our Ethical Skincare Ratings Table. No.7 has many issues to address and should change its business activities in order to reach our ethical benchmark and achieve Ethical Accreditation. Much of No.7’s poor ethical business practices come as a result of being owned by Walgreens Boots Alliance, an infamous global corporation.

In which areas does No.7 score poorly?

Although No.7 states that it is “against animal testing” and that none of its products is sold in-store in mainland China, its parent company, Walgreens Boots Alliance confirms that it allows animal testing when required by law. Consequently, No.7 receives a bottom rating for Animal Welfare.

Therefore, consumers wanting to purchase fully cruelty-free products may want to steer clear of No.7.

Additionally, as Walgreens Boots Alliance makes regular political donations in the United States, which amounts to millions of dollars, No.7 receives a bottom rating for Political Donations.

In which areas does No.7 score well?

No.7 receives a middle rating for Vegetarian/Vegan Verified, as although its products are not certified by any external organisation, it claims to have some vegan friendly products within its range.

Ethical performance in category

0

GSG score

39
75

GSG category benchmark

100

Ethical Rating

Environment

  • Environmental Report

    Good

  • Genetic Modification

    Good

  • Organic

    Poor

  • Nuclear Power

    Good

  • Fossil Fuels

    Good

Animal

  • Animal Welfare

    Poor

  • Vegetarian/Vegan Verified

    Acceptable

People

  • Armaments

    Good

  • Irresponsible Marketing

    Poor

  • Political Donations

    Poor

Other

  • Ethical Accreditation

    Poor

  • Public Record Criticisms

    Poor

= GSG Top Rating = GSG Middle Rating = GSG Bottom Rating