Skip to content

Ethical brand ratings and accreditation since 2001

Back to table

Farrow & Ball

How ethical is Farrow & Ball?

Farrow & Ball is a brand of paint which was founded in Dorset, UK in 1946 by chemist John Farrow and engineer Richard Ball who met at a local clay pit.

Farrow & Ball has been given a below-benchmark score on The Good Shopping Guide’s Ethical Paint Ratings Table. Although it has not yet met our ethical benchmark, we hope to see Farrow & Ball make progress in future.

Read more about the issues facing the Ethical Paint sector and find out which companies have achieved accreditation for their commitment to being ethical and sustainable.

 

In which areas does Farrow & Ball perform poorly?

Farrow & Ball is given a bottom rating for our Nuclear Power and Fossil Fuels criteria, as parent company, Hempel, provides products and services to both of these industries. It gets a middle rating for Armaments as Hempel provides products to the Royal Navy. Find out more about how we rate by exploring our ethical criteria.

 

In which areas does Farrow & Ball score well for its ethics?

Farrow & Ball gets a top score for its Environmental Report as Hempel has a page called ‘Futureproof’ which includes targets such as becoming carbon neutral by 2025.

We found no criticisms of Farrow & Ball relating to; Animal Welfare or Political Donations, so it scores well for these criteria.

How can Farrow & Ball improve its ethical rating?

The below-benchmark score that Farrow & Ball is awarded is the result of an evaluation of multiple ethical criteria. To reach our minimum benchmark score and qualify for Ethical Accreditation, Farrow & Ball has some issues to resolve including its involvement in the Fossil Fuels industry.

Were you aware that your brand could benefit from Ethical Accreditation? Brands accredited by The Good Shopping Guide can display our Ethical Mark, showcasing to consumers that it is an ethical and sustainable brand. If you’re interested in learning more, please contact us or complete a Free Initial Assessment form.

Ethical performance in category

0

GSG score

59
75

GSG category benchmark

100

Ethical Rating

Environment

  • Environmental Report

    Good

  • Nuclear Power

    Poor

  • Toxic Chemicals Policy

    Good

  • Fossil Fuels

    Poor

Animal

  • Animal Welfare

    Acceptable

People

  • Armaments

    Acceptable

  • Political Donations

    Good

Other

  • Ethical Accreditation

    Poor

  • Public Record Criticisms

    Good

= GSG Top Rating = GSG Middle Rating = GSG Bottom Rating